Hero banner

Calcium & vitamin D

Type Recommendation
When to deprescribe
CBR

Calcium supplementation

We suggest deprescribing calcium supplementation be offered to community-dwelling people* with a daily calcium dietary intake of > 1,300 mg.*

* Ongoing treatment recommended for people living in a residential aged care service

CBR

Vtamin D supplementation

Given the limited evidence to support the routine use of vitamin D supplementation, we suggest deprescribing be offered to community-dwelling people* with optimal serum vitamin D concentrations (≥ 50 nmol/L) who are not at risk of vitamin D deficiency or fractures.*

* Ongoing treatment recommended for people living in a residential aged care service

Ongoing treatment
CBR

Calcium supplementation

We suggest continuing calcium supplementation in older people for long-term indications such as calcium used as a phosphate-lowering therapy in people with chronic kidney disease.

CBR

Vtamin D supplementation

We suggest continuing vitamin D supplementation, at optimal dosage, for long-term indications (e.g. calcitriol for the management of mineral and bone disease in chronic kidney disease, regardless of measured vitamin D levels).

How to deprescribe
CBR

We suggest discontinuing calcium and vitamin D without the need for tapering.

Monitoring
CBR

We suggest periodic monitoring for changes in dietary intake and/or sunlight exposure (taking into consideration seasonal changes) while working on potentially modifiable risk factors to reduce fall and fracture risk through other approaches (e.g. environmental changes, exercise).

CBR, consensus-based recommendation

Calcium

Calcium and vitamin D supplementation are widely used among older people to support bone health and prevent osteoporosis and fractures. While the optimal daily calcium requirement is not firmly established, most guidelines recommend a dietary intake of 1,000 to 1,300 mg per day [508, 509]. If dietary intake meets these requirements, supplementation is generally unnecessary. However, many individuals overestimate their daily calcium intake [510], making it important to evaluate actual intake, particularly in those with low bone mineral density. A practical tool for this assessment is an online calcium calculator, such as the International Osteoporosis Foundation Calcium Calculator (https://www.osteoporosis.foundation/educational-hub/topic/calcium-calculator) [508].

Vitamin D

Vitamin D plays a crucial role in calcium homeostasis, bone mineralisation, and various physiological functions, including immune system support [511]. In Australia, sunlight (ultraviolet) exposure is the primary source of vitamin D [512]. The amount of ultraviolet exposure required for adequate vitamin D synthesis depends on skin type, extent of skin exposure, and environmental factors such as geographic location, season, time of day, and cloud cover [511]. Generally, exposing approximately 15% of the body’s surface (e.g. hands, face, and arms) for around 10 minutes in the mid-morning or mid-afternoon on most days during summer is sufficient to maintain adequate vitamin D levels. Although sunscreen has been shown to block vitamin D synthesis in laboratory settings, its impact on vitamin D levels in real-world conditions appears minimal [509].

Vitamin D Production and Dietary Sources

Older people have a reduced ability to synthesise vitamin D due to age-related declines in skin capacity and metabolic changes [513]. They may require longer sun exposure to achieve the same level of vitamin D production as younger individuals. However, factors such as skin cancer concerns, limited mobility, being housebound, or residing in a residential aged care service can restrict sun exposure. In such cases, dietary sources, such as fatty fish (e.g. salmon), eggs, meats, and fortified dairy products can help maintain vitamin D levels [508, 509]. However, most individuals obtain less than 10% of their vitamin D requirements from diet alone [514], making supplementation necessary for some people.

Indicator of vitamin D status

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) is the standard biomarker for assessing vitamin D status, though optimal concentrations vary across guidelines [515]. Both low and excessively high 25(OH)D levels have been linked to adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular diseases and tuberculosis [516]. Additionally, variability in analytical methods can affect the accuracy of 25(OH)D measurements [517].

Vitamin D deficiency is typically defined as a serum 25(OH)D concentration below 30 nmol/L, while levels between 30–50 nmol/L are considered insufficient. Healthy Bones Australia recommends maintaining a concentration of at least 50 nmol/L year-round [518]. Overscreening for vitamin D deficiency in healthy older people has led to concerns about unnecessary testing and overtreatment [519].

Refer to the narrative evidence summary, the GRADE Summary of Findings table in the guidelines, and the Technical Report for a complete presentation of the deprescribing evidence based on the GRADE framework (including other factors considered in developing the recommendations).

For frail older people living in residential aged care services, current guidelines recommend ongoing calcium and vitamin D supplementation, along with adequate protein intake, to prevent fracture [480]. If discontinuation of calcium and/or vitamin D is deemed appropriate, periodic monitoring of dietary intake and sunlight exposure (taking into consideration seasonal variation) is important to promptly detect any potential deficiency [480]. As part of a holistic approach to fall and fracture prevention, it is also essential to address modifiable risk factors through other strategies. These may include environmental modifications and participating in fall prevention exercise programs, which have been shown to significantly reduce fall-related injuries, including fractures [480].

Calcium

Calcium is generally well-tolerated, but excessive doses may increase the risk of renal calculi, constipation, and abdominal bloating [520]. Some studies have suggested a potential link between calcium supplementation and an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke, though the evidence remains inconclusive [521, 522]. Calcium supplementation alone has not been shown to significantly reduce the risk of fractures of any type [523, 524]. However, in older people living in a residential aged care service, combined calcium and vitamin D supplementation has demonstrated a reduction in fracture risk [525]. Calcium supplementation is recommended when daily dietary calcium intake is below 1,300 mg [526]. If supplementation is necessary, doses of 250-600 mg of elemental calcium daily are generally recommended, depending on dietary intake [509]. Other long-term indications that may require ongoing treatment include the use of calcium as a phosphate-lowering therapy for individuals with hyperphosphatemia and chronic kidney disease if appropriate [527]. However, its use requires caution due to the risk of hypercalcaemia [528].

Vitamin D

For individuals undergoing antiresorptive therapy for osteoporosis, vitamin D supplementation is recommended if serum 25(OH)D levels fall below 50 nmol/L. Most guidelines suggest daily doses of 600-800 IU of vitamin D for the general older population, with higher doses required for those with moderate-to-severe deficiency [508, 509]. Other long-term indications that may require ongoing treatment include the use of calcitriol for the management of mineral and bone disease in chronic kidney disease if appropriate, regardless of measured vitamin D levels [527]. However, its use requires caution due to the risk of [528].

Given the lack of clear evidence supporting the routine use of vitamin D supplementation in relatively healthy, community-dwelling older people, supplementation is generally not recommended for individuals with 25(OH)D levels between 30–50 nmol/L. In fact, high doses of vitamin D (e.g. > 60,000 IU monthly or > 1,000-4,000 IU daily) have been associated with an increased risk of falls in older adults [529, 530].

A 2018 systematic review and meta-analysis of 81 RCTs found that vitamin D supplementation alone did not significantly reduce the risk of falls or fractures, or improve bone mineral density [531]. This was consistent across both high and low doses of vitamin D supplementation, with most studies conducted in community-dwelling individuals.

In contrast, a Cochrane review found that vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced the rate of falls in residential aged care settings, though it did not lower the overall risk of falling [532].

The 2024 VITAL (VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL), a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, examined the effects of daily supplementation with 2,000 IU of vitamin D or omega-3 fatty acids (460 mg eicosapentaenoic acid and 380 mg docosahexaenoic acid) on physical performance in healthy adults (mean age 65) [533]. Participants with a history of cancer (except nonmelanoma skin cancer), cardiovascular disease, hypercalcemia, parathyroid disorders, renal failure, severe liver disease, sarcoidosis, or other serious conditions were excluded. The mean baseline 25(OH)D level was 28 ng/mL. At two years, there were no significant differences between the supplementation and placebo groups in physical performance measures, including strength, balance, and walking speed. Similar findings were reported in the 2020 DO-HEALTH RCT, which included older participants (mean age = 75) with lower baseline 25(OH)D levels (mean = 22 ng/mL) [534].

We identified one RCT related to calcium and vitamin D deprescribing [535], one RCT related to calcitriol deprescribing [423], and one prospective cohort study related to calcium deprescribing [536] from the systematic review and meta-analysis.

Overall, there are some reports that there may be a decline in BMD following discontinuation of calcium and/or vitamin D, especially in women. However, these reported outcomes are of very low to low certainty and are surrogate outcomes indicative of fracture risks. It is difficult to interpret the effects of deprescribing in the absence of a true active group for comparison. The evidence is of very low certainty and inadequate to inform evidence-based recommendations.

Key study characteristics and results

A narrative summary of each study is provided below, highlighting key characteristics and main findings.

Dawson-Hughes 2000 reported follow-up results from a two-year study extended from a three-year RCT of calcium and vitamin D supplementation (as 500mg of elemental calcium and 700 units of vitamin D) [535]. This study included 295 men (n=128) and women (n=167) who had completed the original RCT. Participants were excluded from the main trial if they had hyperparathyroidism, concurrent therapy with a bisphosphonate, calcitonin, estrogen, tamoxifen, or testosterone in the past six months, therapy with fluoride in the last two years, femoral neck BMD T-scores below -2, or dietary calcium intake > 1500 mg per day. The study sought to determine whether gains in BMD induced by calcium and vitamin D supplementation persist after discontinuation. In men, benefits gained from calcium and vitamin D from supplementation in spinal and femoral neck BMD were lost after discontinuation but small benefits in total-body BMD remained. In women, there were no lasting benefits in BMD. There was no significant difference between the group who discontinued calcium and vitamin D supplementation and the group who discontinued placebo in terms of non-vertebral fractures (5 vs 9; OR 1.84, 95% CI 0.60, 5.62).

Gallagher 2002 conducted a five-year 2x2 factorial RCT comparing MHT, calcitriol, MHT with calcitriol, or placebo for three years and the effect of discontinuing therapy for two more years [423]. All participants were women aged over 65 who did not have primary hyperparathyroidism and were not taking bisphosphonates, anticonvulsants, estrogen, fluoride, or thiazide diuretics, in the past six months. After discontinuing therapy at the end of year three, much of the bone density gained during treatment was lost in all three treatment groups, although all treated groups still had a significantly higher total body bone mineral density (BMD) compared to placebo. Compared to the group who were untreated (placebo group), those who took calcitriol for the preceding three years before two years discontinuation had a significantly lower percentage change from baseline to five years in the BMD for the total body (MD 1.31, 95% CI 1.14, 1.48; study = 1), spine (MD 0.89, 95% CI 0.55, 1.23), total hip (MD 1.04, 95% CI 0.73, 1.35) compared to the group who were chronically untreated, but significantly higher percentage change in the BMD for femoral neck (MD -0.34, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.03). However, there was no significant difference in the percentage change for trochanter BMD (MD 0.27, 95% CI -0.12, 0.66) between the two groups.

Radford 2014 reported follow-up five-year results from a study extended from a five-year RCT of calcium supplementation [536]. All participants included in the original RCT were females who were at least five years post-menopause with a normal lumbar spine BMD for their age. The RCT excluded women who were receiving treatment for osteoporosis with serum vitamin D levels < 25 nmol/L. The current follow-up study included a selected subset of 194 participants who were randomised to receive calcium for five years in the original RCT and did not take bone-active medicines post-trial. After five years following the discontinuation of calcium, there were no persisting benefits of calcium on BMD at the spine, femoral neck or total body. In addition, the adverse effects of calcium supplements on cardiovascular risk also did not persist after discontinuation.

In the prospective cohort study, calcium was discontinued abruptly [536]. The method of deprescribing was not described in two RCTs [423, 535].