Need full text to finish bias table
| Methods | Study design:
Number of groups: |
| Participants | Number of participants:
Active group: Age:) Sex: female Participants with dementia: Inclusion criteria: · ≥ Exclusion criteria: ≤ Concomitant medicines: Country: Setting: |
| Interventions | Medicine:
Intervention: Withdrawal schedule: Tool used to identify target medicines: Comparator: |
| Outcomes | |
| Dates | Dates:
Follow-up duration: |
| Funding sources | |
| Notes |
Risk of bias table
| Bias | Authors’ judgment | Support for judgment |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | ||
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | ||
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) | ||
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) | ||
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) | ||
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | ||
| Confounding (non-randomized) | ||
| Other bias | ||
| Selection bias | Representativeness of the exposed cohort | |
| Selection of the non-exposed cohort | ||
| Ascertainment of exposure | ||
| Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study | ||
| Comparability bias | Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis | |
| Outcome bias | Assessment of outcome | |
| Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur | ||
| Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts | ||
Leave a Reply